Skip to content

For Physicians

Who to refer, and when

Neuromodulation outcomes are largely determined before the first lead is placed. This page sets out the selection reasoning so referrals arrive at the right time, with the right documentation, for the right phenotype.

Begin the chapter

What You'll Learn

Approx. 10 min min read
  • Identify the pain phenotypes with the strongest response signal
  • Match presentation to target — dorsal column, DRG or peripheral nerve
  • Recognise the modifiable factors that should be addressed before referral
  • Know what documentation makes authorisation straightforward

The selection problem

Technology has advanced faster than selection has.

Waveforms, closed-loop control and lead design have all improved substantially over the last decade. Selection criteria, by contrast, have changed relatively little, and remain the largest single determinant of whether a given patient benefits. A well-selected patient on a decade-old platform generally does better than a poorly-selected patient on the newest one.

The practical implication for referral is that the useful question is not whether a patient has failed enough treatment to justify a trial. It is whether their pain has the characteristics that neuromodulation actually addresses.

Phenotype First

Four questions that sort most referrals

Is the pain neuropathic?

Burning, electric, lancinating quality; allodynia or hyperalgesia; a distribution that follows neural rather than musculoskeletal anatomy. This remains the strongest predictor of response.

Is it focal or diffuse?

Focal pain confined to a single dermatome or a distal limb region is DRG territory. Broad multi-dermatomal or axial pain is dorsal column territory. Getting this wrong is a common reason for a failed trial.

How long has it been present?

Response rates decline with pain duration. Referral after two years does better than referral after ten. 'Last resort' framing systematically delays referral past the point of best benefit.

Is there a correctable structural lesion?

Progressive neurological deficit, significant instability or a surgically correctable compressive lesion should be addressed before neuromodulation is considered, not after.

Target Selection

Matching presentation to target

The initial branch point, before any question of manufacturer or waveform.

PresentationUsual targetRationale
Persistent spinal pain syndrome, back and legDorsal column (SCS)Broad coverage across multiple dermatomes; the population with the deepest evidence base
Non-surgical refractory back painDorsal column (SCS)Specific FDA indications now exist; consider before further imaging-led escalation
Focal CRPS of a foot, knee or handDorsal root ganglionStable, position-independent focal coverage of a single dermatome — the ACCURATE population
Groin, pelvic or post-herniorrhaphy painDorsal root ganglionRegions that are notoriously difficult to cover reliably from the dorsal columns
Painful diabetic neuropathy of the feetDorsal column (SCS)Supported by randomised data; bilateral distal coverage is achievable
Post-amputation or post-surgical mononeuropathyPeripheral nerveA single identifiable nerve; a temporary 60-day system may be sufficient
Mechanical low back pain with multifidus dysfunctionMedial branch (restorative)A different mechanism entirely — restoring motor control rather than masking pain signalling
Most failed trials are not device failures. They are target failures — the right therapy aimed at the wrong structure.

Before Referral

Modifiable factors worth addressing first

None of these are absolute contraindications. All of them measurably reduce the odds of a good outcome if left unaddressed.

  • Infection risk

    Active smoking and poorly controlled diabetes

    Both raise surgical site infection risk and impair healing. HbA1c and smoking status should be documented; smoking cessation support before referral is genuinely worthwhile.

  • Psychiatric

    Untreated depression, anxiety or catastrophising

    These blunt response to any pain therapy. Identifying and treating them improves outcomes; they are not grounds for exclusion, but they should not be discovered at the psychological evaluation.

  • Pharmacology

    High-dose opioid therapy

    Very high morphine-equivalent doses are associated with poorer trial outcomes. A tapering plan initiated before referral improves both the trial result and the interpretation of it.

  • Anticoagulation

    Antithrombotic management

    Epidural haematoma is the rare complication with the worst consequences. Document the agent, indication and prescriber so a management plan can be agreed in advance.

  • Expectations

    The expectation of cure

    A patient expecting elimination of pain will report a successful trial as a failure. Framing the goal as meaningful relief plus functional gain before referral changes how the trial is experienced.

  • Sleep

    Untreated sleep disorder

    Sleep fragmentation amplifies pain and confounds trial interpretation. Screening for obstructive sleep apnoea is worth doing in this population.

Referral Packet

What to send with the referral

A complete packet typically removes several weeks from the authorisation timeline.

  • Recent advanced imaging of the relevant region, with the images not only the report
  • Operative reports for any prior spine surgery, with levels and dates
  • Documented conservative care with dates and outcomesPhysical therapy, medication trials, injections, ablation — payers require a defined period of documented failure.
  • Current medication list including anticoagulants and morphine-equivalent dose
  • Relevant comorbidities: HbA1c, smoking status, immunosuppression, prior infections
  • Any prior psychological evaluation
  • A clear statement of the pain distribution and qualityThis is what determines target selection, and it is the item most often missing.

Refer urgently, not routinely, for these

Progressive motor deficit, new bowel or bladder dysfunction, saddle anaesthesia, suspected infection, or suspected malignancy require urgent surgical or oncological assessment rather than a neuromodulation referral. Neuromodulation treats pain; it does not treat the lesion causing it.

Common Questions

Common referral questions

Planning a referral

Discuss the referral with a qualified neuromodulation clinician in your region. Record-transfer and consultation procedures vary by practice and location.